| Title |
Reliability of Scapular Classification in Examination of Professional Baseball Players
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-011-2216-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Todd S. Ellenbecker, W. Ben Kibler, David S. Bailie, Roger Caplinger, George J. Davies, Bryan L. Riemann |
| Abstract |
Clinically evaluating the scapulothoracic joint is challenging. To identify scapular dyskinesis, clinicians typically observe scapular motion and congruence during self-directed upper extremity movements. However, it is unclear whether this method is reliable. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 30% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 24% |
| Unknown | 24 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 40% |
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 30 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,559,025
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#741
of 7,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,135
of 179,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#13
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.