↓ Skip to main content

Guidance for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 1,044)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
270 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
626 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Guidance for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11239-015-1317-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael B. Streiff, Giancarlo Agnelli, Jean M. Connors, Mark Crowther, Sabine Eichinger, Renato Lopes, Robert D. McBane, Stephan Moll, Jack Ansell

Abstract

This guidance document focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Efficient, cost effective diagnosis of VTE is facilitated by combining medical history and physical examination with pre-test probability models, D dimer testing and selective use of confirmatory imaging. Clinical prediction rules, biomarkers and imaging can be used to tailor therapy to disease severity. Anticoagulation options for acute VTE include unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux and the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). DOACs are as effective as conventional therapy with LMWH and vitamin K antagonists. Thrombolytic therapy is reserved for massive pulmonary embolism (PE) or extensive deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Inferior vena cava filters are reserved for patients with acute VTE and contraindications to anticoagulation. Retrievable filters are strongly preferred. The possibility of thoracic outlet syndrome and May-Thurner syndrome should be considered in patients with subclavian/axillary and left common iliac vein DVT, respectively in absence of identifiable triggers. The optimal duration of therapy is dictated by the presence of modifiable thrombotic risk factors. Long term anticoagulation should be considered in patients with unprovoked VTE as well as persistent prothrombotic risk factors such as cancer. Short-term therapy is sufficient for most patients with VTE associated with transient situational triggers such as major surgery. Biomarkers such as D dimer and risk assessment models such the Vienna risk prediction model offer the potential to customize VTE therapy for the individual patient. Insufficient data exist to support the integration of bleeding risk models into duration of therapy planning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 626 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 615 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 85 14%
Student > Postgraduate 74 12%
Student > Master 67 11%
Other 59 9%
Researcher 49 8%
Other 134 21%
Unknown 158 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 301 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 28 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 2%
Other 49 8%
Unknown 179 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,648,891
of 24,570,543 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#46
of 1,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,121
of 402,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,570,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.