↓ Skip to main content

現代美術家の作品コンセプト生成過程の解明

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
現代美術家の作品コンセプト生成過程の解明
Published in
Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, June 2015
DOI 10.11225/jcss.22.235
Authors

髙木 紀久子, 河瀬 彰宏, 横地 早和子, 岡田 猛

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,994,699
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#96
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,491
of 281,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them