Title |
Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry, microbiology and laboratory medicine: discussions on current practice and future directions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Accreditation and Quality Assurance, August 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00769-018-1343-7 |
Authors |
Brian Brookman, Owen Butler, Laura Ciaralli, Monika Horsky, Caroline Laurent, Tracey Noblett, Ulf Örnemark, Marina Patriarca, Lorens P. Sibbesen, Ulla Tiikkainen, Kees van Putten, Piotr Robouch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
Australia | 2 | 10% |
Kenya | 2 | 10% |
Belgium | 1 | 5% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 5% |
Turkey | 1 | 5% |
Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 5% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
Finland | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
Scientists | 6 | 30% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 19% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 19% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 5 | 31% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,949,108
of 24,187,394 outputs
Outputs from Accreditation and Quality Assurance
#4
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,827
of 337,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Accreditation and Quality Assurance
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,187,394 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them