↓ Skip to main content

Thalidomide and neurotrophism

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Radiology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Thalidomide and neurotrophism
Published in
Skeletal Radiology, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00256-018-3086-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith R. Soper, S. Fiona Bonar, Dudley J. O’Sullivan, Janet McCredie, Hans-Georg Willert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 26%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,143,314
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#806
of 1,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,929
of 349,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#48
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.