↓ Skip to main content

Effects of salience-network-node neurofeedback training on affective biases in major depressive disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging Section, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 816)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of salience-network-node neurofeedback training on affective biases in major depressive disorder
Published in
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging Section, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.01.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Paul Hamilton, Gary H. Glover, Epifanio Bagarinao, Catie Chang, Sean Mackey, Matthew D. Sacchet, Ian H. Gotlib

Abstract

Neural models of major depressive disorder (MDD) posit that over-response of components of the brain's salience network (SN) to negative stimuli plays a crucial role in the pathophysiology of MDD. In the present proof-of-concept study, we tested this formulation directly by examining the affective consequences of training depressed persons to down-regulate response of SN nodes to negative material. Ten participants in the real neurofeedback group saw, and attempted to learn to down-regulate, activity from an empirically identified node of the SN. Ten other participants engaged in an equivalent procedure with the exception that they saw SN-node neurofeedback indices from participants in the real neurofeedback group. Before and after scanning, all participants completed tasks assessing emotional responses to negative scenes and to negative and positive self-descriptive adjectives. Compared to participants in the sham-neurofeedback group, from pre- to post-training, participants in the real-neurofeedback group showed a greater decrease in SN-node response to negative stimuli, a greater decrease in self-reported emotional response to negative scenes, and a greater decrease in self-reported emotional response to negative self-descriptive adjectives. Our findings provide support for a neural formulation in which the SN plays a primary role in contributing to negative cognitive biases in MDD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 178 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 24%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 35 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 31%
Neuroscience 39 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 48 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#687,706
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging Section
#12
of 816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,345
of 402,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging Section
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.