↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for the Carers of Patients With Eating Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for the Carers of Patients With Eating Disorders
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11920-015-0652-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet Treasure, Bruno Palazzo Nazar

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the recent literature on carers/parenting interventions for people with eating disorders. Interesting and important new findings are highlighted as well as the implications that this may have for treatment. We have reviewed and critically analysed the recent literature. Close others often play an important role in recognising the early signs of eating disorders and accessing and implementing treatment. Their role in helping with recovery is to give support and hold a united front themselves and with the professional team to avoid those common interpersonal reactions that adversely impact on outcome such as accommodating to the illness and reacting with high expressed emotion (overprotection and hostility). Managing this role is difficult, and coping resources are often strained. Carers ask for and are now getting expert training in skills to manage this role. There is an overlap between carer/parenting interventions and family therapies. The interface with close others is critical both for early recognition and access and implementation of treatment. Interventions which equip families and close others with the skills to manage eating disorder behaviours are showing potential at improving outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 172 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 50 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 56 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,156,892
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#524
of 1,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,729
of 394,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#20
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.