You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Holocene climate changes in eastern Beringia (NW North America) – A systematic review of multi-proxy evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quaternary Science Reviews, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.10.021 |
| Authors |
Darrell S. Kaufman, Yarrow L. Axford, Andrew C.G. Henderson, Nicholas P. McKay, W. Wyatt Oswald, Casey Saenger, R. Scott Anderson, Hannah L. Bailey, Benjamin Clegg, Konrad Gajewski, Feng Sheng Hu, Miriam C. Jones, Charly Massa, Cody C. Routson, Al Werner, Matthew J. Wooller, Zicheng Yu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 22% |
| Researcher | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 60 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2019.
All research outputs
#16,443,300
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#3,030
of 4,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,839
of 351,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#40
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.