↓ Skip to main content

Competitive lobbying for a legislator's vote

Overview of attention for article published in Social Choice and Welfare, July 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
210 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Competitive lobbying for a legislator's vote
Published in
Social Choice and Welfare, July 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00192880
Authors

David Austen-Smith, John R. Wright

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
Poland 1 3%
Unknown 35 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 45%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 55%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 28%
Philosophy 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Social Choice and Welfare
#154
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,664
of 19,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Choice and Welfare
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them