↓ Skip to main content

Apoptosis, autophagy and unfolded protein response pathways in Arbovirus replication and pathogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Apoptosis, autophagy and unfolded protein response pathways in Arbovirus replication and pathogenesis
Published in
Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine, January 2016
DOI 10.1017/erm.2015.19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahmoud Iranpour, Adel Rezaei Moghadam, Mina Yazdi, Sudharsana R. Ande, Javad Alizadeh, Emilia Wiechec, Robbin Lindsay, Michael Drebot, Kevin M. Coombs, Saeid Ghavami

Abstract

Arboviruses are pathogens that widely affect the health of people in different communities around the world. Recently, a few successful approaches toward production of effective vaccines against some of these pathogens have been developed, but treatment and prevention of the resulting diseases remain a major health and research concern. The arbovirus infection and replication processes are complex, and many factors are involved in their regulation. Apoptosis, autophagy and the unfolded protein response (UPR) are three mechanisms that are involved in pathogenesis of many viruses. In this review, we focus on the importance of these pathways in the arbovirus replication and infection processes. We provide a brief introduction on how apoptosis, autophagy and the UPR are initiated and regulated, and then discuss the involvement of these pathways in regulation of arbovirus pathogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 31 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,782,514
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine
#226
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,379
of 394,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.