You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Directions for the International Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ISRII)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, September 2006
|
| DOI | 10.2196/jmir.8.3.e23 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lee M Ritterband, Gerhard Andersson, Helen M Christensen, Per Carlbring, Pim Cuijpers |
| Abstract |
In 2004, the International Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ISRII) was formed to encourage eHealth researchers to collaborate in their efforts to further the science behind developing, testing, and disseminating Web-based treatment programs. The group held its second meeting (April 2006) to clarify the Society's direction and identify key issues that need addressing in the field. These issues are identified and examined in the current paper. Given the success of using the Internet to treat a range of medical and mental health problems, and the growing need for better dissemination of health care, Internet interventions will almost certainly play a prominent role in global health. ISRII plans to provide the necessary venue to ensure the science driving this field is strong, enabling researchers to conduct the highest quality research and permitting meaningful conclusions from completed studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 18% |
| Researcher | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 49 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2012.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#7,622
of 7,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,008
of 87,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.