↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive Control Mechanisms Revealed by ERP and fMRI: Evidence from Repeated Task-Switching

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
325 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive Control Mechanisms Revealed by ERP and fMRI: Evidence from Repeated Task-Switching
Published in
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, August 2003
DOI 10.1162/089892903322370717
Pubmed ID
Authors

R Swainson, R Cunnington, G M Jackson, C Rorden, A M Peters, P G Morris, S R Jackson

Abstract

We investigated the extent to which a common neural mechanism is involved in task set-switching and response withholding, factors that are frequently confounded in task-switching and go/no-go paradigms. Subjects' brain activity was measured using event-related electrical potentials (ERPs) and event-related functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging in separate studies using the same cognitive paradigm. Subjects made compatible left/right keypress responses to left/right arrow stimuli of 1000 msec duration; they switched every two trials between responding at stimulus onset (GO task-green arrows) and stimulus offset (WAIT task-red arrows). With-holding an immediate response (WAIT vs. GO) elicited an enhancement of the frontal N2 ERP and lateral PFC activation of the right hemisphere, both previously associated with the "no-go" response, but only on switch trials. Task-switching (switch vs. nonswitch) was associated with frontal N2 amplification and right hemisphere ventrolateral PFC activation, but only for the WAIT task. The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) was the only brain region to be activated for both types of task switch, but this activation was located more rostrally for the WAIT than for the GO switch trials. We conclude that the frontal N2 ERP and lateral PFC activation are not markers for withholding an immediate response or switching tasks per se, but are associated with switching into a response-suppression mode. Different regions within the ACC may be involved in two processes integral to task-switching: processing response conflict (rostral ACC) and overcoming prior response suppression (caudal ACC).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 307 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 72 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 20%
Student > Master 35 11%
Professor 28 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 28 9%
Other 73 22%
Unknown 25 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 168 52%
Neuroscience 32 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 6%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 39 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2011.
All research outputs
#15,239,825
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
#1,608
of 2,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,899
of 48,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.