↓ Skip to main content

A Low-Cost Stove Use Monitor to Enable Conditional Cash Transfers

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
A Low-Cost Stove Use Monitor to Enable Conditional Cash Transfers
Published in
EcoHealth, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10393-018-1379-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ajay Pillarisetti, Manpreet Gill, Tracy Allen, Sathish Madhavan, Arun Dhongade, Makarand Ghorpade, Sudipto Roy, Kalpana Balakrishnan, Sanjay Juvekar, Kirk R. Smith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 20%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Other 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 24 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Psychology 5 8%
Computer Science 4 6%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Engineering 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 24 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#20,537,234
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#659
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,528
of 346,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.