↓ Skip to main content

Potential New Method of Mixture Effects Testing Using Metabolomics and Caenorhabditis elegans

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Proteome Research, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential New Method of Mixture Effects Testing Using Metabolomics and Caenorhabditis elegans
Published in
Journal of Proteome Research, January 2012
DOI 10.1021/pr201142c
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver A. H. Jones, C. Swain Suresh, Claus Svendsen, Julian L. Griffin, Stephen R. Sturzenbaum, David J. Spurgeon

Abstract

The development of superior tools for molecular and computational biology in recent years has provided an opportunity for the creation of faster toxicological screens that are relevant for, but do not rely on, mammalian systems. In this study, NMR spectroscopy and GC-MS based metabolomics have been used in conjunction with multivariate statistics to examine the metabolic changes in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans following exposure to different concentrations of the heavy metal nickel, the pesticide chlorpyrifos, and their mixture. Novel metabolic profiles were associated with both exposure and dose level. The biochemical responses were more closely matched when exposure was at the same effect level, even for different chemicals, than when exposure was for different levels of the same chemical (e.g., low versus high dose). Responses to the mixture reflected the contribution of the chemicals to the overall exposure. In common with the metabolic responses of several other species exposed to the same chemicals, we observed changes in branch chain amino acids and tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates. These results form the basis for a rapid and economically viable toxicity test that defines the molecular effects of pollution/toxicant exposure in a manner that is relevant to higher vertebrates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 65 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 27%
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Master 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 37%
Environmental Science 13 18%
Chemistry 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,239,825
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Proteome Research
#4,404
of 6,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,903
of 243,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Proteome Research
#38
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.