↓ Skip to main content

Why choose high volume online post-dilution hemodiafiltration?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nephrology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Why choose high volume online post-dilution hemodiafiltration?
Published in
Journal of Nephrology, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40620-016-0343-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlo Basile, Andrew Davenport, Peter J. Blankestijn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 22%
Researcher 9 15%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Psychology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#21,498,958
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nephrology
#867
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,371
of 342,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nephrology
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.