↓ Skip to main content

Significant improvements in quality of life following paediatric tonsillectomy: a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Irish Journal of Medical Science, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Significant improvements in quality of life following paediatric tonsillectomy: a prospective cohort study
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11845-016-1398-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Thong, K. Davies, E. Murphy, I. Keogh

Abstract

The clinical efficacy of adenotonsillectomy is under debate with falling tonsillectomy rates in the UK and Ireland. In 2010, an NHS commissioned randomised controlled trial recommended medical management, leading to some Primary Care Trusts refusing to commission any tonsillectomies at all. With the HSE cutting Hospital Spending by €200 million euro in 2014, data supporting the benefit of adenotonsillectomy in the Irish population are sorely lacking. We aimed to evaluate the symptomatic benefit reported by parents of children undergoing adenotonsillectomy/tonsillectomy in the Irish population. We utilised the T14 Paediatric Throat disorders Outcome Test, a disease-specific, validated questionnaire which assesses patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). We administered pre and post-operative questionnaires to parents of children ages 3-16 years undergoing tonsillectomy. Symptomatic children on our tonsillectomy waiting list were also simultaneously recruited. Eighty-six children were recruited. A total of 55 parents of children undergoing tonsillectomy filled questionnaires. These were well matched in age and gender with 31 children on the waiting list. An independent samples t test was conducted to compare the improvement scores for tonsillectomy and control groups. There was a significant difference in scores for the tonsillectomy group, with pre-operative scores of (M = 39.8, SD = 9.7) and at post-operative follow-up of (M = 1.6, SD = 7.3) t (61) = -18, p ≤ 0.0001 (two tailed). This correlated with a significant difference in the mean between the two periods (mean difference = 38.3, 95 % CI: 42.3-34.1). This study provides clear evidence that tonsillectomy provides significant improvement in PROMs vs. watchful waiting. We consider tonsillectomy to be a procedure of considerable clinical benefit and a worthwhile allocation of HSE expenditure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Student > Postgraduate 4 21%
Other 3 16%
Librarian 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2017.
All research outputs
#17,782,514
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Irish Journal of Medical Science
#925
of 1,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,832
of 393,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Irish Journal of Medical Science
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.