↓ Skip to main content

More attentional focusing through binaural beats: evidence from the global–local task

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Research, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 1,016)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
8 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
More attentional focusing through binaural beats: evidence from the global–local task
Published in
Psychological Research, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00426-015-0727-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorenza S. Colzato, Hayley Barone, Roberta Sellaro, Bernhard Hommel

Abstract

A recent study showed that binaural beats have an impact on the efficiency of allocating attention over time. We were interested to see whether this impact affects attentional focusing or, even further, the top-down control over irrelevant information. Healthy adults listened to gamma-frequency (40 Hz) binaural beats, which are assumed to increase attentional concentration, or a constant tone of 340 Hz (control condition) for 3 min before and during a global-local task. While the size of the congruency effect (indicating the failure to suppress task-irrelevant information) was unaffected by the binaural beats, the global-precedence effect (reflecting attentional focusing) was considerably smaller after gamma-frequency binaural beats than after the control condition. Our findings suggest that high-frequency binaural beats bias the individual attentional processing style towards a reduced spotlight of attention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Other 10 6%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 37 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 23%
Neuroscience 28 17%
Engineering 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 44 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2023.
All research outputs
#382,619
of 25,245,273 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Research
#17
of 1,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,110
of 399,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Research
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,245,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.