↓ Skip to main content

Groups 4 Health: Evidence that a social-identity intervention that builds and strengthens social group membership improves mental health

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Affective Disorders, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
281 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
566 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Groups 4 Health: Evidence that a social-identity intervention that builds and strengthens social group membership improves mental health
Published in
Journal of Affective Disorders, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Haslam, Tegan Cruwys, S. Alexander Haslam, Genevieve Dingle, Melissa Xue-Ling Chang

Abstract

Social isolation and disconnection have profound negative effects on mental health, but there are few, if any, theoretically-derived interventions that directly target this problem. We evaluate a new intervention, Groups 4 Health (G4H), a manualized 5-module psychological intervention that targets the development and maintenance of social group relationships to treat psychological distress arising from social isolation. G4H was tested using a non-randomized control design. The program was delivered to young adults presenting with social isolation and affective disturbance. Primary outcome measures assessed mental health (depression, general anxiety, social anxiety, and stress), well-being (life satisfaction, self-esteem) and social connectedness (loneliness, social functioning). Our secondary goal was to assess whether mechanisms of social identification were responsible for changes in outcomes. G4H was found to significantly improve mental health, well-being, and social connectedness on all measures, both on program completion and 6-month follow-up. In line with social identity theorizing, analysis also showed that improvements in depression, anxiety, stress, loneliness, and life satisfaction were underpinned by participants' increased identification both with their G4H group and with multiple groups. This study provides preliminary evidence of the potential value of G4H and its underlying mechanisms, but further examination is required in other populations to address issues of generalizability, and in randomized controlled trials to address its wider efficacy. Results of this pilot study confirm that G4H has the potential to reduce the negative health-related consequences of social disconnection. Future research will determine its utility in wider community contexts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 566 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 564 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 16%
Student > Master 80 14%
Student > Bachelor 65 11%
Researcher 41 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 7%
Other 86 15%
Unknown 162 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 212 37%
Social Sciences 38 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 3%
Sports and Recreations 13 2%
Other 69 12%
Unknown 188 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,517,785
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Affective Disorders
#903
of 10,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,006
of 405,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Affective Disorders
#18
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.