↓ Skip to main content

TROM: A Testing-Based Method for Finding Transcriptomic Similarity of Biological Samples

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
TROM: A Testing-Based Method for Finding Transcriptomic Similarity of Biological Samples
Published in
arXiv, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12561-016-9163-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Vivian Li, Yiling Chen, Jingyi Jessica Li

Abstract

Comparative transcriptomics has gained increasing popularity in genomic research thanks to the development of high-throughput technologies including microarray and next-generation RNA sequencing that have generated numerous transcriptomic data. An important question is to understand the conservation and divergence of biological processes in different species. We propose a testing-based method TROM (Transcriptome Overlap Measure) for comparing transcriptomes within or between different species, and provide a different perspective, in contrast to traditional correlation analyses, about capturing transcriptomic similarity. Specifically, the TROM method focuses on identifying associated genes that capture molecular characteristics of biological samples, and subsequently comparing the biological samples by testing the overlap of their associated genes. We use simulation and real data studies to demonstrate that TROM is more powerful in identifying similar transcriptomes and more robust to stochastic gene expression noise than Pearson and Spearman correlations. We apply TROM to compare the developmental stages of six Drosophila species, C. elegans, S. purpuratus, D. rerio and mouse liver, and find interesting correspondence patterns that imply conserved gene expression programs in the development of these species. The TROM method is available as an R package on CRAN (https://cran.r-project.org/package=TROM) with manuals and source codes available at http://www.stat.ucla.edu/~jingyi.li/software-and-data/trom.html.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 31%
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Other 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Mathematics 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,823,770
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#71,504
of 973,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,244
of 317,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#1,570
of 18,349 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 973,463 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18,349 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.