↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge of oral cancer risk factors amongst high‐risk Australians: findings from the LESIONS programme

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Dental Journal, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge of oral cancer risk factors amongst high‐risk Australians: findings from the LESIONS programme
Published in
Australian Dental Journal, December 2016
DOI 10.1111/adj.12408
Pubmed ID
Authors

F Dost, L Do, CS Farah

Abstract

Patient awareness of risk factors associated with cancer has been shown to increase patient presentation for screening and early detection. This study aims to identify the level of awareness of oral cancer risk factors in a high risk Australian population. Participants were recruited from the LESIONS program between April 2012 and April 2014. Demographics were collected via semi-structured interview. A self-administered questionnaire was provided, listing a number of possible oral cancer risk factors. Participants were requested to indicate their level of agreement on a three point scale. Bivariate and multivariable analysis was performed. A total of 1498 participants took part in the LESIONS program and were invited to complete the questionnaire. The most common risk factors thought to be associated with oral cancer were smoking (87.5%), poor oral hygiene (67.9%) and family history (61.1%). Only 50.2% of respondents were aware of alcohol consumption as a risk factor. While most participants were aware of the association between smoking and oral cancer, only half were aware of the significant risk alcohol consumption poses. A significant portion of participants also held a number of inaccurate beliefs in relation to oral cancer risk. These findings can benefit both clinicians and public health policy makers in targeting oral cancer education. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 15 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,937,149
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from Australian Dental Journal
#200
of 760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,609
of 430,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Dental Journal
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 760 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.