| Title |
Infanticide in chimpanzees: Review of cases and a new within-group observation from the Kanyawara study group in Kibale National Park
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Primates, April 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02557557 |
| Authors |
Adam Clark Arcadi, Richard W. Wrangham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 41% |
| Psychology | 15 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,518,697
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#235
of 1,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,168
of 35,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them