↓ Skip to main content

Laser-based standoff detection of explosives: a critical review

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Laser-based standoff detection of explosives: a critical review
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00216-009-2844-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Wallin, Anna Pettersson, Henric Östmark, Alison Hobro

Abstract

A review of standoff detection technologies for explosives has been made. The review is focused on trace detection methods (methods aiming to detect traces from handling explosives or the vapours surrounding an explosive charge due to the vapour pressure of the explosive) rather than bulk detection methods (methods aiming to detect the bulk explosive charge). The requirements for standoff detection technologies are discussed. The technologies discussed are mostly laser-based trace detection technologies, such as laser-induced-breakdown spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, laser-induced-fluorescence spectroscopy and IR spectroscopy but the bulk detection technologies millimetre wave imaging and terahertz spectroscopy are also discussed as a complement to the laser-based methods. The review includes novel techniques, not yet tested in realistic environments, more mature technologies which have been tested outdoors in realistic environments as well as the most mature millimetre wave imaging technique.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 172 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 27%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 3%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 64 35%
Chemistry 38 21%
Engineering 30 16%
Materials Science 6 3%
Chemical Engineering 5 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 24 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2012.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,695
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,431
of 125,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#17
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.