↓ Skip to main content

Using the World Ethos Body of Thought as a Compass for Managers some Thoughts on the Practical Application of a Philosophical Concept

Overview of attention for article published in Humanistic Management Journal, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Using the World Ethos Body of Thought as a Compass for Managers some Thoughts on the Practical Application of a Philosophical Concept
Published in
Humanistic Management Journal, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s41463-018-0043-0
Authors

Klaus M. Leisinger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#17,993,371
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Humanistic Management Journal
#83
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,313
of 350,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Humanistic Management Journal
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.