Title |
Transmission electron microscopy of cellulose. Part 1: historical perspective
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cellulose, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10570-018-2076-9 |
Authors |
Yu Ogawa, Henri Chanzy, Jean-Luc Putaux |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 3 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Finland | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 19% |
Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Materials Science | 11 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 17% |
Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,612,714
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#212
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,757
of 347,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.