↓ Skip to main content

Visual interpretation of stereoscopic NDVI satellite images to map rainfall-induced landslides

Overview of attention for article published in Landslides, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Visual interpretation of stereoscopic NDVI satellite images to map rainfall-induced landslides
Published in
Landslides, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10346-018-1069-y
Authors

Federica Fiorucci, Francesca Ardizzone, Alessandro Cesare Mondini, Alessia Viero, Fausto Guzzetti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Lecturer 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 37%
Environmental Science 8 13%
Engineering 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,548,510
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#335
of 529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,065
of 349,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.