| Title |
Trends of autumn counts at Iberian migration bottlenecks as a tool for monitoring continental populations of soaring birds in Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1047-4 |
| Authors |
Beatriz Martín, Alejandro Onrubia, Andrés de la Cruz, Miguel Ferrer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| Finland | 1 | 11% |
| Georgia | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 11% |
| Morocco | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,696,826
of 24,755,976 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#390
of 2,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,452
of 405,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,755,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.