You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using discrete‐return airborne laser scanning to quantify number of canopy strata across diverse forest types
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12510 |
| Authors |
Phil Wilkes, Simon D. Jones, Lola Suarez, Andrew Haywood, Andrew Mellor, William Woodgate, Mariela Soto‐Berelov, Andrew K. Skidmore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 34 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 15% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,130,914
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,001
of 2,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,849
of 394,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#20
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.