Title |
In Vivo Tumor-Targeted Dual-Modality PET/Optical Imaging with a Yolk/Shell-Structured Silica Nanosystem
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nano-Micro Letters, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s40820-018-0216-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sixiang Shi, Feng Chen, Shreya Goel, Stephen A. Graves, Haiming Luo, Charles P. Theuer, Jonathan W. Engle, Weibo Cai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 24% |
Unspecified | 5 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 13 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 7 | 18% |
Unspecified | 5 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#20,537,234
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Nano-Micro Letters
#906
of 983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,053
of 326,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano-Micro Letters
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 983 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.