| Title |
The power of paradox: some recent developments in interactive epistemology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Game Theory, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00182-006-0061-2 |
| Authors |
Adam Brandenburger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 29% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Professor | 9 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 21 | 27% |
| Philosophy | 11 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 13% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 23% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2007.
All research outputs
#5,804,639
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Game Theory
#27
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,324
of 160,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Game Theory
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them