| Title |
Cork oak pests: a review of insect damage and management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13595-015-0534-1 |
| Authors |
Riziero Tiberi, Manuela Branco, Matteo Bracalini, Francesco Croci, Tiziana Panzavolta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 57% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,115,370
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#130
of 951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,983
of 404,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.