Title |
Polyhydroxyalkanoates in waste activated sludge enhances anaerobic methane production through improving biochemical methane potential instead of hydrolysis rate
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1038/srep19713 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qilin Wang, Jing Sun, Chang Zhang, Guo-Jun Xie, Xu Zhou, Jin Qian, Guojing Yang, Guangming Zeng, Yiqi Liu, Dongbo Wang |
Abstract |
Anaerobic sludge digestion is the main technology for sludge reduction and stabilization prior to sludge disposal. Nevertheless, methane production from anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge (WAS) is often restricted by the poor biochemical methane potential and slow hydrolysis rate of WAS. This work systematically investigated the effect of PHA levels of WAS on anaerobic methane production, using both experimental and mathematical modeling approaches. Biochemical methane potential tests showed that methane production increased with increased PHA levels in WAS. Model-based analysis suggested that the PHA-based method enhanced methane production by improving biochemical methane potential of WAS, with the highest enhancement being around 40% (from 192 to 274 L CH4/kg VS added; VS: volatile solid) when the PHA levels increased from 21 to 143 mg/g VS. In contrast, the hydrolysis rate (approximately 0.10 d(-1)) was not significantly affected by the PHA levels. Economic analysis suggested that the PHA-based method could save $1.2/PE/y (PE: population equivalent) in a typical wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). The PHA-based method can be easily integrated into the current WWTP to enhance methane production, thereby providing a strong support to the on-going paradigm shift in wastewater management from pollutant removal to resource recovery. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 15% |
Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 13% |
Engineering | 8 | 11% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 9% |
Chemical Engineering | 6 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 34 | 45% |