↓ Skip to main content

ASO Author Reflections: Heterogeneity of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
ASO Author Reflections: Heterogeneity of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2018
DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6713-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Massironi, Roberta Elisa Rossi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Engineering 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,548,510
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,461
of 6,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,549
of 334,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#99
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.