↓ Skip to main content

Why Are Half of Women Interested in Participating in Group Prenatal Care?

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Why Are Half of Women Interested in Participating in Group Prenatal Care?
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10995-015-1807-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah D. McDonald, Wendy Sword, Leyla N. Eryuzlu, Binod Neupane, Joseph Beyene, Anne B. Biringer

Abstract

To determine the likelihood of participating in group prenatal care (GPC) and associated factors among low-risk women receiving traditional prenatal care from obstetricians, family physicians or midwives, and to determine factors associated with likelihood of participating. Prior to completing a self-administered questionnaire, a 2-min compiled video of GPC was shown to pregnant women receiving traditional prenatal care. Data were collected on opinions of current prenatal care, GPC, and demographics. Biologically plausible variables with a p value ≤0.20 were entered in the multivariable logistic regression model and those with a p value <0.05 were retained. Of 477 respondents, 234 [49.2 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 44.6-53.6 %] reported being "definitely" or "probably likely" to participate in GPC. Women were more likely to participate in GPC if they had at least postsecondary education [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.84, 95 % CI 1.05-3.24], had not discussed labour with their care provider (aOR 1.67, 95 % CI 1.12-2.44), and valued woman-centeredness ("fairly important" aOR 2.81, 95 % CI 1.77-4.49; "very important" aOR 4.10, 95 % CI 2.45-6.88). Women placed high importance on learning components of GPC. The majority would prefer to be with similar women, especially in age. About two-thirds would prefer to have support persons attend GPC and over half would be comfortable with male partners. Approximately half of women receiving traditional prenatal care were interested in participating in GPC. Our findings will hopefully assist providers interested in optimizing satisfaction with traditional prenatal care and GPC by identifying important elements of each, and thus help engage women to consider GPC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 22%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 24%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Psychology 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2016.
All research outputs
#19,436,760
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#1,694
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,484
of 267,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#30
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.