↓ Skip to main content

The Worse Prognosis of Right-Sided Compared with Left-Sided Colon Cancers: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
The Worse Prognosis of Right-Sided Compared with Left-Sided Colon Cancers: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11605-015-3026-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masashi Yahagi, Koji Okabayashi, Hirotoshi Hasegawa, Masashi Tsuruta, Yuko Kitagawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Researcher 19 12%
Other 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Master 13 8%
Other 35 23%
Unknown 33 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Engineering 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 41 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,369,329
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#98
of 2,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,368
of 278,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#3
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,601 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.