| Title |
Tree thinking and species delimitation: Guidelines for taxonomy and phylogenetic terminology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mammalian Biology, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mambio.2015.10.002 |
| Authors |
Frank E. Zachos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 25% |
| Brazil | 3 | 15% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
| Scientists | 4 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 8 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 224 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 142 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,983,330
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Biology
#109
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,010
of 312,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Biology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them