↓ Skip to main content

Overfitting in semantics-based automated program repair

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Software Engineering, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Overfitting in semantics-based automated program repair
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10664-017-9577-2
Authors

Xuan Bach D. Le, Ferdian Thung, David Lo, Claire Le Goues

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 32%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 36 60%
Engineering 4 7%
Psychology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,898,538
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#217
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,244
of 331,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.