↓ Skip to main content

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Pregnant and Postpartum Women With H1N1-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Obstetrics & Gynecology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Pregnant and Postpartum Women With H1N1-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Published in
Obstetrics & Gynecology, February 2016
DOI 10.1097/aog.0000000000001236
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio F. Saad, Mahbubur Rahman, Dirk M. Maybauer, John F. Fraser, Maged M. Costantine, Luis D. Pacheco, Marc O. Maybauer

Abstract

To assess available evidence regarding the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in pregnant and postpartum women with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to H1N1 infection. Databases from MEDLINE (U.S. National Library of Medicine, 1946 to April 1, 2015), the Cochrane Library Controlled Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science were queried for studies on ECMO in pregnant or postpartum patients with ARDS. Search terms included: "ARDS," "ECMO," "pregnant," and "postpartum." All relevant references in any language were reviewed. Literature for inclusion and methodologic quality were reviewed based on the meta-analyses and systematic reviews of observational studies (Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. Of 266 citations, five retrospective studies (39 patients) fulfilled our inclusion criteria. No randomized controlled trials were found. The pooled estimate of the survival rate among pregnant and postpartum patients who received ECMO for ARDS secondary to H1N1 was 74.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.7-88.6%). Neonatal outcomes were reported in two studies and the rate of live birth was 70% (95% CI 43.7-95.2). Heterogeneity was not significant among studies (I ranged from 0% to 21%; P>.25). The role of ECMO in pregnant and postpartum women with ARDS from H1N1 remains unclear and the benefits suggested from our review should be interpreted with caution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 25%
Student > Master 8 13%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,007,001
of 25,501,527 outputs
Outputs from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#4,230
of 8,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,084
of 407,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#63
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,501,527 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.