You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes: a systematic review and economic evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3310/hta15440 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T G Pavey, N Anokye, A H Taylor, P Trueman, T Moxham, K R Fox, M Hillsdon, C Green, J L Campbell, C Foster, N Mutrie, J Searle, R S Taylor |
| Abstract |
Exercise referral schemes (ERS) aim to identify inactive adults in the primary-care setting. The GP or health-care professional then refers the patient to a third-party service, with this service taking responsibility for prescribing and monitoring an exercise programme tailored to the needs of the individual. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 433 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 79 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 75 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 76 | 17% |
| Unknown | 88 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 125 | 27% |
| Psychology | 51 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 46 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 13% |
| Unknown | 104 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2015.
All research outputs
#5,310,822
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#605
of 1,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,213
of 246,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.