| Title |
Why are there no small species among xylem-sucking insects?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolutionary Ecology, July 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1018432807165 |
| Authors |
Vojtech Novotny, Michael R. Wilson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 104 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Professor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 91 | 76% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,762,814
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Ecology
#122
of 709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,521
of 29,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Ecology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them