↓ Skip to main content

Clinical significance of GRHL3 expression in diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Clinical significance of GRHL3 expression in diffuse large B cell lymphoma
Published in
Tumor Biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-4772-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Liu, Minwen Ha, Xiaodong Wang, Nanchang Yin

Abstract

In the present study, we assessed the GRHL3 expression in 967 patients with diffuse large B cell lymphomas to identify the potential prognostic value and the development of specific therapeutic strategies. All patients enrolled were from a previous study by Hao Zhang et al. (BMC Cancer 14:333, 2014). GRHL3 expression status was evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis. Survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analysis were conducted to adjust the effect of GRHL3 expression as a potential independent prognostic factor. In the enrolled 967 patients, GRHL3 expression was detected in 398 (41.16 %) patients under immunohistochemical analysis. The 5-year survival rate in patients with GRHL3 expression was significantly lower than that in those without GRHL3 expression (37.8 vs 52.8 %, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified GRHL3 expression as an independent predictor of poor survival. The sensitivity and specificity of GRHL3 for the diagnosis of germinal center B cell (GCB)/non-GCB was 89.2 % (182/204) and 82.1 % (174/212), respectively. GRHL3 expression may be useful as a prognostic factor and for the diagnosis GCB/non-GCB of diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 40%
Researcher 3 30%
Lecturer 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,901,114
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,073
of 2,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,270
of 398,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#58
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.