↓ Skip to main content

Dietary substitution effect of Ulva australis for Undaria pinnatifida on growth, body composition and air exposure of juvenile abalone, Haliotis discus (Reeve 1846)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Phycology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Dietary substitution effect of Ulva australis for Undaria pinnatifida on growth, body composition and air exposure of juvenile abalone, Haliotis discus (Reeve 1846)
Published in
Journal of Applied Phycology, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10811-018-1654-4
Authors

Most. Waheda Rahman Ansary, Hae Seung Jeong, Ki Wook Lee, Pil Youn Kim, June Kim, Ah-Yeong Yun, Sung Hwoan Cho, Tae-Ik Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 22%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,329,158
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#425
of 2,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,370
of 350,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#7
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.