↓ Skip to main content

Classroom Standing Desks and Sedentary Behavior: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
45 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Classroom Standing Desks and Sedentary Behavior: A Systematic Review
Published in
Pediatrics, February 2016
DOI 10.1542/peds.2015-3087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karl E. Minges, Ariana M. Chao, Melinda L. Irwin, Neville Owen, Chorong Park, Robin Whittemore, Jo Salmon

Abstract

Reducing sedentary behaviors, or time spent sitting, is an important target for health promotion in children. Standing desks in schools may be a feasible, modifiable, and acceptable environmental strategy to this end. To examine the impact of school-based standing desk interventions on sedentary behavior and physical activity, health-related outcomes, and academic and behavioral outcomes in school-aged children. Ovid Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Global Health, and CINAHL. Full-text peer-reviewed journal publications written in English; samples of school-aged youth (5-18 years of age); study designs including the same participants at baseline and follow-up; and use of a standing desk as a component of the intervention. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eight studies satisfied selection criteria and used quasi-experimental (n = 4), randomized controlled trial (n = 3), and pre-post, no control (n = 1) designs. When examined, time spent standing increased in all studies (effect sizes: 0.38-0.71), while sitting time decreased from a range of 59 to 64 minutes (effect sizes: 0.27-0.49). Some studies reported increased physical activity and energy expenditure and improved classroom behavior. One-half of the studies had nonrandomized designs, and most were pilot or feasibility studies. This initial evidence supports integrating standing desks into the classroom environment; this strategy has the potential to reduce sitting time and increase standing time among elementary schoolchildren. Additional research is needed to determine the impact of standing desks on academic performance and precursors of chronic disease risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 359 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 44 12%
Researcher 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 77 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 65 18%
Sports and Recreations 65 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 11%
Social Sciences 26 7%
Psychology 23 6%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 95 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#577,852
of 25,107,281 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#2,135
of 18,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,711
of 409,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#49
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,107,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.