↓ Skip to main content

Toward integration of genomic selection with crop modelling: the development of an integrated approach to predicting rice heading dates

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Toward integration of genomic selection with crop modelling: the development of an integrated approach to predicting rice heading dates
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00122-016-2667-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akio Onogi, Maya Watanabe, Toshihiro Mochizuki, Takeshi Hayashi, Hiroshi Nakagawa, Toshihiro Hasegawa, Hiroyoshi Iwata

Abstract

It is suggested that accuracy in predicting plant phenotypes can be improved by integrating genomic prediction with crop modelling in a single hierarchical model. Accurate prediction of phenotypes is important for plant breeding and management. Although genomic prediction/selection aims to predict phenotypes on the basis of whole-genome marker information, it is often difficult to predict phenotypes of complex traits in diverse environments, because plant phenotypes are often influenced by genotype-environment interaction. A possible remedy is to integrate genomic prediction with crop/ecophysiological modelling, which enables us to predict plant phenotypes using environmental and management information. To this end, in the present study, we developed a novel method for integrating genomic prediction with phenological modelling of Asian rice (Oryza sativa, L.), allowing the heading date of untested genotypes in untested environments to be predicted. The method simultaneously infers the phenological model parameters and whole-genome marker effects on the parameters in a Bayesian framework. By cultivating backcross inbred lines of Koshihikari × Kasalath in nine environments, we evaluated the potential of the proposed method in comparison with conventional genomic prediction, phenological modelling, and two-step methods that applied genomic prediction to phenological model parameters inferred from Nelder-Mead or Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. In predicting heading dates of untested lines in untested environments, the proposed and two-step methods tended to provide more accurate predictions than the conventional genomic prediction methods, particularly in environments where phenotypes from environments similar to the target environment were unavailable for training genomic prediction. The proposed method showed greater accuracy in prediction than the two-step methods in all cross-validation schemes tested, suggesting the potential of the integrated approach in the prediction of phenotypes of plants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Professor 6 5%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Computer Science 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2016.
All research outputs
#13,974,740
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#2,626
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,002
of 398,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#17
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.