↓ Skip to main content

Inhospitable Healthcare Spaces: Why Diversity Training on LGBTQIA Issues Is Not Enough

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 672)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
Inhospitable Healthcare Spaces: Why Diversity Training on LGBTQIA Issues Is Not Enough
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11673-016-9738-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan A. Dean, Elizabeth Victor, Laura Guidry-Grimes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 178 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Researcher 11 6%
Other 41 23%
Unknown 37 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 18%
Social Sciences 27 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 12%
Psychology 21 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 46 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,237,125
of 25,709,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#40
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,887
of 372,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,709,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them