↓ Skip to main content

Biomarkers for infection: enzymes, microbes, and metabolites

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
Title
Biomarkers for infection: enzymes, microbes, and metabolites
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00253-015-6637-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregor Tegl, Doris Schiffer, Eva Sigl, Andrea Heinzle, Georg M. Guebitz

Abstract

Wound infection is a severe complication causing delayed healing and risks for patients. Conventional methods of diagnosis for infection involve error-prone clinical description of the wound and time-consuming microbiological tests. More reliable alternatives are still rare, except for invasive and unaffordable gold standard methods. This review discusses the diversity of new approaches for wound infection determination. There has been progress in the detection methods of microorganisms, including the assessment of the diversity of the bacterial community present in a wound, as well as in the elaboration of specific markers. Another interesting strategy involves the quantification of enzyme activities in the wound fluid secreted by the immune system as response to infection. Color-changing substrates for these enzymes consequently have been shown to allow detection of an infection in wounds in a fast and easy way. Promising results were also delivered in measuring pH changes or detecting enhanced amounts of volatile molecules in case of infection. A simple and effective infection detection tool is not yet on the market, but innovative ideas pave the way for the investigation of fast and easy point-of-care devices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 138 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Student > Master 24 17%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 25 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 14%
Chemistry 19 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 13%
Engineering 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 27 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,446,017
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1,086
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,391
of 267,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#14
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.