↓ Skip to main content

Coronal Holes

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Solar Physics, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
351 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Coronal Holes
Published in
Living Reviews in Solar Physics, September 2009
DOI 10.12942/lrsp-2009-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven R. Cranmer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Turkey 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 33%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 54 68%
Engineering 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Chemistry 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,148,499
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Solar Physics
#59
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,648
of 106,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Solar Physics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them