↓ Skip to main content

Recidivism Rates Among Child Molesters and Rapists: A Methodological Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Law and Human Behavior, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
233 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Recidivism Rates Among Child Molesters and Rapists: A Methodological Analysis
Published in
Law and Human Behavior, January 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1024860714738
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert A. Prentky, Austin F. S. Lee, Raymond A. Knight, David Cerce

Abstract

We address the high variability in sex offender recidivism rates by examining several of the critical methodological differences that underlie this variability. We used a dataset on 251 sex offenders (136 rapists and 115 child molesters) who were discharged over a 25-year period to examine changes in recidivism as a function of changes in dispositional definition of reoffense (e.g., arrest or conviction), changes in the domain of criminal offenses that are considered, and changes in the length of exposure time. The data indicate that: (a) both rapists and child molesters remain at risk to reoffend long after their discharge, in some cases 15-20 years after discharge; (b) there was a marked underestimation of recidivism when calculating a simple proportion (%) consisting of those who were known to have reoffended during the follow-up period, and (c) there was a marked underestimation of recidivism when the criterion was based on conviction or imprisonment. Forensic, clinical and policy implications of this high variability are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 54%
Social Sciences 11 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Philosophy 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,215,436
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from Law and Human Behavior
#70
of 1,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#934
of 93,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law and Human Behavior
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them