You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clonal Relatedness and Mutational Differences between Upper Tract and Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-2039 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
François Audenet, Sumit Isharwal, Eugene K. Cha, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Esther N. Drill, Irina Ostrovnaya, Eugene J. Pietzak, John P. Sfakianos, Aditya Bagrodia, Paari Murugan, Guido Dalbagni, Timothy F. Donahue, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dean F. Bajorin, Maria E. Arcila, Jaclyn F. Hechtman, Michael F. Berger, Barry S. Taylor, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Jonathan A. Coleman, David B. Solit |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 71% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,006,579
of 24,969,131 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#3,744
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,401
of 449,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#73
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,969,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.