Title |
Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Die Chirurgie, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00104-015-0149-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
E. S. Debus, D. Manzoni, C.-A. Behrendt, F. Heidemann, R. T. Grundmann |
Abstract |
Endovascular therapy has widely replaced conventional open vascular surgical reconstruction. For this reason, both techniques were widely considered to be competing approaches. Evidence-based data from randomized prospective trials, meta-analyses and clinical registries, however, demonstrated that both techniques should be used to complement each other. It became increasingly more evident that the use of either procedure depends on the underlying disease and the anatomical conditions, whereby a combination of both (hybrid approach) may be the preferred option in certain situations. This review focuses on the treatment of patients with carotid artery stenosis, intermittent claudication, critical limb ischemia and acute limb ischemia. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |