↓ Skip to main content

Should heart rate variability be “corrected” for heart rate? Biological, quantitative, and interpretive considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Psychophysiology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Should heart rate variability be “corrected” for heart rate? Biological, quantitative, and interpretive considerations
Published in
Psychophysiology, October 2018
DOI 10.1111/psyp.13287
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eco J. C. de Geus, Peter J. Gianaros, Ryan C. Brindle, J. Richard Jennings, Gary G. Berntson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 289 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 19%
Researcher 49 17%
Student > Master 35 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 64 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 70 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 11%
Engineering 20 7%
Neuroscience 20 7%
Sports and Recreations 18 6%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 86 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,277,684
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Psychophysiology
#325
of 2,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,533
of 361,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychophysiology
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.